Abstract
Objectives: The bonding interface of glass ceramics and resin luting cements plays an important role in the long-term durability of ceramic restorations. The purpose of this systematic review is to discuss the various factors involved with the bond between glass ceramics and resin luting cements.
Methods: An electronic Pubmed, Medline and Embase search was conducted to obtain laboratory studies on resin–ceramic bonding published in English and Chinese between 1972 and 2012.
Results and discussion: Eighty-three articles were included in this review. Various factors that have a possible impact on the bond between glass ceramics and resin cements were discussed, including ceramic type, ceramic crystal structure, resin luting cements, light curing, surface treatments, and laboratory test methodology.
Conclusions: Resin–ceramic bonding has been improved substantially in the past few years. Hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching followed by silanizaiton has become the most widely accepted surface treatment for glass ceramics. However, further studies need to be undertaken to improve surface preparations without HF because of its toxicity. Laboratory test methods are also required to better simulate the actual oral environment for more clinically compatible testing.
Methods: An electronic Pubmed, Medline and Embase search was conducted to obtain laboratory studies on resin–ceramic bonding published in English and Chinese between 1972 and 2012.
Results and discussion: Eighty-three articles were included in this review. Various factors that have a possible impact on the bond between glass ceramics and resin cements were discussed, including ceramic type, ceramic crystal structure, resin luting cements, light curing, surface treatments, and laboratory test methodology.
Conclusions: Resin–ceramic bonding has been improved substantially in the past few years. Hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching followed by silanizaiton has become the most widely accepted surface treatment for glass ceramics. However, further studies need to be undertaken to improve surface preparations without HF because of its toxicity. Laboratory test methods are also required to better simulate the actual oral environment for more clinically compatible testing.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | e147-e162 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Dental Materials |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 7 |
Early online date | 6 Mar 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2014 |
Keywords
- glass ceramics
- resin luting cements
- laboratory tests
- bonding
- systematic review