TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing molecular simulation for the analysis of lipid monolayer reflectometry
AU - McCluskey, AR
AU - Grant, J
AU - Smith, AJ
AU - Rawle, JL
AU - Barlow, DJ
AU - Lawrence, Jayne
AU - Parker, SC
AU - Edler, KJ
PY - 2019/7/3
Y1 - 2019/7/3
N2 - Using molecular simulation to aid in the analysis of neutron reflectometry measurements is commonplace. However, reflectometry is a tool to probe large-scale structures, and therefore the use of all-atom simulation maybe irrelevant. This work presents the first direct comparison between the reflectometry profiles obtained from different all-atom and coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. These are compared with a traditional model layer structure analysis method to determine the minimum simulation resolution required to accurately reproduce experimental data. We find that systematic limits reduce the efficacy of the MARTINI potential model, while the Berger united-atom and Slipids all-atom potential models agree similarly well with the experimental data. The model layer structure gives the best agreement, however, the higher resolution simulation-dependent methods produce an agreement that is comparable. Finally, we use the atomistic simulation to advise on possible improvements that maybe offered to the model layer structures, creating a more realistic monolayer model. Usage: Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) including all analysis/plotting scripts and figure files, allowing for a fully reproducible, and automated, analysis workflow for the work presented is available at https:// github.com/arm61/sim_vs_trad (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3254719) under a CCBY-SA 4.0 license. Reduced experimental datasets are available at DOI : 10.15125/BATH-00586, under a CC-BY 4.0 license.
AB - Using molecular simulation to aid in the analysis of neutron reflectometry measurements is commonplace. However, reflectometry is a tool to probe large-scale structures, and therefore the use of all-atom simulation maybe irrelevant. This work presents the first direct comparison between the reflectometry profiles obtained from different all-atom and coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. These are compared with a traditional model layer structure analysis method to determine the minimum simulation resolution required to accurately reproduce experimental data. We find that systematic limits reduce the efficacy of the MARTINI potential model, while the Berger united-atom and Slipids all-atom potential models agree similarly well with the experimental data. The model layer structure gives the best agreement, however, the higher resolution simulation-dependent methods produce an agreement that is comparable. Finally, we use the atomistic simulation to advise on possible improvements that maybe offered to the model layer structures, creating a more realistic monolayer model. Usage: Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) including all analysis/plotting scripts and figure files, allowing for a fully reproducible, and automated, analysis workflow for the work presented is available at https:// github.com/arm61/sim_vs_trad (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3254719) under a CCBY-SA 4.0 license. Reduced experimental datasets are available at DOI : 10.15125/BATH-00586, under a CC-BY 4.0 license.
KW - neutron reflectometry; molecular dynamics; coarse graining; multi modal analysis
U2 - 10.1088/2399-6528/ab12a9
DO - 10.1088/2399-6528/ab12a9
M3 - Article
SN - 2399-6528
VL - 3
JO - Journal of Physics Communications
JF - Journal of Physics Communications
IS - 7
M1 - UNSP 075001
ER -