Abstract
European Union (EU) interventions in conflict countries tend to focus on governance reforms of political and economic frameworks instead of the geopolitical context or the underlying power asymmetries that fuel conflict. They follow a liberal pattern often associated with northern donors and the UN system more generally. The EU's approach diverges from prevalent governance paradigms mainly in its engagement with social, identity and socio-economic exclusion. This article examines the EU's ‘peace-as-governance’ model in Cyprus, Georgia, Palestine and Bosnia and Herzegovina. These cases indicate that a tense and contradictory strategic situation may arise from an insufficient redress of underlying conflict issues.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 227-249 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | European Security |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute