TY - JOUR
T1 - Audit and the Pursuit of Dynamic Repair
AU - Humphrey, Christopher
AU - Sonnerfeldt, Amanda
AU - Komori, Naoko
AU - Curtis, Emer
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse [grant number P18-0095]. We are grateful for the valuable comments on previous versions of this paper received from the two anonymous reviewers as well as Bertrand Malsch, Brendan O?Dwyer, Mary Canning, David Hatherly, Stuart Turley and Jim Peterson.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021/6/25
Y1 - 2021/6/25
N2 - Is audit capable of evolving into something that is more consistently valued and socially purposeful? We address this fundamental question, utilizing Sennett’s (2008). The Craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press) notion of ‘dynamic repair’ to present four key ways of thinking differently about the statutory financial audit and its core conceptual foundations. First, we highlight the capacity for audit to be regarded as a first-order function of value in its own right rather than a second-order function inherently dependent on corporate financial statements. Second, we call for a change in the assumed relationship between audit and assurance, arguing that assurance should be treated as a sub-set of audit rather than the other way round. Third, we consider the scope for audit standard setting to provide a space for ‘product’ innovation. Finally, we advocate moving beyond presumptions that the current statutory financial audit serves ‘the public interest’ to asking deeper questions about the type of society we want to inhabit and whether audit has a more direct and valued contribution to make. Collectively, such re-conceptualizations offer a broader canvas for audit innovation and can help to sustain the promise of current audit reform initiatives proposed by the Brydon Report and others.
AB - Is audit capable of evolving into something that is more consistently valued and socially purposeful? We address this fundamental question, utilizing Sennett’s (2008). The Craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press) notion of ‘dynamic repair’ to present four key ways of thinking differently about the statutory financial audit and its core conceptual foundations. First, we highlight the capacity for audit to be regarded as a first-order function of value in its own right rather than a second-order function inherently dependent on corporate financial statements. Second, we call for a change in the assumed relationship between audit and assurance, arguing that assurance should be treated as a sub-set of audit rather than the other way round. Third, we consider the scope for audit standard setting to provide a space for ‘product’ innovation. Finally, we advocate moving beyond presumptions that the current statutory financial audit serves ‘the public interest’ to asking deeper questions about the type of society we want to inhabit and whether audit has a more direct and valued contribution to make. Collectively, such re-conceptualizations offer a broader canvas for audit innovation and can help to sustain the promise of current audit reform initiatives proposed by the Brydon Report and others.
KW - Assurance Services
KW - Audit
KW - Brydon Report
KW - Public Interest
U2 - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638180.2021.1919539
DO - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638180.2021.1919539
M3 - Article
VL - 30
SP - 445
EP - 471
JO - European Accounting Review
JF - European Accounting Review
SN - 0963-8180
IS - 3
ER -