Automated assessment of area of dense tissue in the breast: A comparison with human estimation

Camilla Jeffries-Chung, Jennifer Diffey, Michael Berks, Joanna Morrison, Rosanne Verow, Julie Morris, Mary Wilson, Caroline Boggis, Nicky Barr, Anthony Maxwell, Alan Hufton, Susan Astley

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    Abstract

    Both interactive thresholding tools and human visual assessment have been related to the risk of developing breast cancer. In this paper we explore the relationship between human assessment of area of dense tissue and the actual thickness of tissue in the breast by using a volumetric density technique to compute areas of dense tissue, varying the threshold below which areas of low density are discounted and observing the correlation with visual assessment of density at different thresholds. Based on analysis of thresholds used in the automated method, radiologists' definition of a dense pixel is one in which the percentage of glandular tissue is between 10% and 20% of the total thickness of the compressed breast at that point. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)|Lect. Notes Comput. Sci.
    PublisherSpringer Nature
    Pages168-174
    Number of pages6
    Volume6136
    ISBN (Print)3642136656, 9783642136658
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010
    Event10th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, IWDM 2010 - Girona, Catalonia
    Duration: 1 Jul 2010 → …

    Conference

    Conference10th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, IWDM 2010
    CityGirona, Catalonia
    Period1/07/10 → …

    Keywords

    • breast density
    • computer analysis
    • human perception
    • risk assessment

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Automated assessment of area of dense tissue in the breast: A comparison with human estimation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this