TY - JOUR
T1 - Automated Quantification of Neuropad Improves Its Diagnostic Ability in Patients with Diabetic Neuropathy
AU - Ponirakis, Georgos
AU - Fadavi, Hassan
AU - Petropoulos, Ioannis N
AU - Azmi, Shazli
AU - Ferdousi, Maryam
AU - Dabbah, Mohammad
AU - Kheyami, Ahmad
AU - Alam, Uazman
AU - Asghar, Omar
AU - Marshall, Andrew
AU - Tavakoli, Mitra
AU - Al-Ahmar, Ahmed
AU - Javed, Saad
AU - Jeziorska, Maria
AU - Malik, Rayaz A
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Neuropad is currently a categorical visual screening test that identifies diabetic patients at risk of foot ulceration. The diagnostic performance of Neuropad was compared between the categorical and continuous (image-analysis (Sudometrics)) outputs to diagnose diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). 110 subjects with type 1 and 2 diabetes underwent assessment with Neuropad, Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS), peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity (PMNCV), sural nerve action potential (SNAP), Deep Breathing-Heart Rate Variability (DB-HRV), intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD), and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). 46/110 patients had DPN according to the Toronto consensus. The continuous output displayed high sensitivity and specificity for DB-HRV (91%, 83%), CNFD (88%, 78%), and SNAP (88%, 83%), whereas the categorical output showed high sensitivity but low specificity. The optimal cut-off points were 90% for the detection of autonomic dysfunction (DB-HRV) and 80% for small fibre neuropathy (CNFD). The diagnostic efficacy of the continuous Neuropad output for abnormal DB-HRV (AUC: 91%, P = 0.0003) and CNFD (AUC: 82%, P = 0.01) was better than for PMNCV (AUC: 60%). The categorical output showed no significant difference in diagnostic efficacy for these same measures. An image analysis algorithm generating a continuous output (Sudometrics) improved the diagnostic ability of Neuropad, particularly in detecting autonomic and small fibre neuropathy.
AB - Neuropad is currently a categorical visual screening test that identifies diabetic patients at risk of foot ulceration. The diagnostic performance of Neuropad was compared between the categorical and continuous (image-analysis (Sudometrics)) outputs to diagnose diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). 110 subjects with type 1 and 2 diabetes underwent assessment with Neuropad, Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS), peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity (PMNCV), sural nerve action potential (SNAP), Deep Breathing-Heart Rate Variability (DB-HRV), intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD), and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). 46/110 patients had DPN according to the Toronto consensus. The continuous output displayed high sensitivity and specificity for DB-HRV (91%, 83%), CNFD (88%, 78%), and SNAP (88%, 83%), whereas the categorical output showed high sensitivity but low specificity. The optimal cut-off points were 90% for the detection of autonomic dysfunction (DB-HRV) and 80% for small fibre neuropathy (CNFD). The diagnostic efficacy of the continuous Neuropad output for abnormal DB-HRV (AUC: 91%, P = 0.0003) and CNFD (AUC: 82%, P = 0.01) was better than for PMNCV (AUC: 60%). The categorical output showed no significant difference in diagnostic efficacy for these same measures. An image analysis algorithm generating a continuous output (Sudometrics) improved the diagnostic ability of Neuropad, particularly in detecting autonomic and small fibre neuropathy.
KW - Action Potentials
KW - Autonomic Nervous System
KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
KW - Diabetic Neuropathies
KW - Female
KW - Foot Ulcer
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Neural Conduction
KW - Physical Examination
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Sural Nerve
KW - Journal Article
KW - Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
U2 - 10.1155/2015/847854
DO - 10.1155/2015/847854
M3 - Article
C2 - 26064991
VL - 2015
JO - Journal of Diabetes Research
JF - Journal of Diabetes Research
SN - 2314-6745
M1 - 847854
ER -