TY - JOUR
T1 - Bayesian Optimization of Wall-Normal Blowing and Suction-Based Flow Control of a NACA 4412 Wing Profile
AU - Mallor, Fermin
AU - Semprini-Cesari, Giacomo
AU - Mukha, Timofey
AU - Rezaeiravesh, Saleh
AU - Schlatter, Philipp
N1 - Funding Information:
Open access funding provided by Royal Institute of Technology. The research was funded by the KAW Academic Fellow program awarded to Philipp Schlatter. Simulations were performed on resources provided by the National Academic Infrastructure for Supercomputing in Sweden (NAISS) at the PDC Center for High Performance Computing in KTH (Stockholm), by the PRACE project nr. 2021250090 on HAWK (Stuttgart) and by the European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (EuroHPC JU) project EHPC-REG-2021R0088 in LUMI (Finland).
Funding Information:
Simulations in this work were performed on resources provided by the National Academic Infrastructure for Supercomputing in Sweden (NAISS) at the PDC Center for High Performance Computing in KTH (Stockholm), by the PRACE project nr. 2021250090 on HAWK (Stuttgart) and by the European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (EuroHPC JU) project EHPC-REG-2021R0088 in LUMI (Finland). This research is funded by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/9/5
Y1 - 2023/9/5
N2 - Active flow-control techniques have shown promise for achieving high levels of drag reduction. However, these techniques are often complex and involve multiple tunable parameters, making it challenging to optimize their efficiency. Here, we present a Bayesian optimization (BO) approach based on Gaussian process regression to optimize a wall-normal blowing and suction control scheme for a NACA 4412 wing profile at two angles of attack: 5 and 11 ∘ , corresponding to cruise and high-lift scenarios, respectively. An automated framework is developed by linking the BO code to the CFD solver OpenFOAM. RANS simulations (validated against high-fidelity LES and experimental data) are used in order to evaluate the different flow cases. BO is shown to provide rapid convergence towards a global maximum, even when the complexity of the response function is increased by introducing a model for the cost of the flow control actuation. The importance of considering the actuation cost is highlighted: while some cases yield a net drag reduction (NDR), they may result in an overall power increase. Furthermore, optimizing for NDR or net power reduction (NPR) can lead to significantly different actuation strategies. Finally, by considering losses and efficiencies representative of real-world applications, still a significant NPR is achieved in the 11 ∘ case, while net power reduction is only marginally positive in the 5 ∘ case.
AB - Active flow-control techniques have shown promise for achieving high levels of drag reduction. However, these techniques are often complex and involve multiple tunable parameters, making it challenging to optimize their efficiency. Here, we present a Bayesian optimization (BO) approach based on Gaussian process regression to optimize a wall-normal blowing and suction control scheme for a NACA 4412 wing profile at two angles of attack: 5 and 11 ∘ , corresponding to cruise and high-lift scenarios, respectively. An automated framework is developed by linking the BO code to the CFD solver OpenFOAM. RANS simulations (validated against high-fidelity LES and experimental data) are used in order to evaluate the different flow cases. BO is shown to provide rapid convergence towards a global maximum, even when the complexity of the response function is increased by introducing a model for the cost of the flow control actuation. The importance of considering the actuation cost is highlighted: while some cases yield a net drag reduction (NDR), they may result in an overall power increase. Furthermore, optimizing for NDR or net power reduction (NPR) can lead to significantly different actuation strategies. Finally, by considering losses and efficiencies representative of real-world applications, still a significant NPR is achieved in the 11 ∘ case, while net power reduction is only marginally positive in the 5 ∘ case.
KW - Bayesian optimization
KW - Drag reduction
KW - Flow control
KW - Gaussian process regression
KW - Turbulence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169823248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/fed981c3-f1a1-36ee-83a2-aa15af0174cb/
U2 - 10.1007/s10494-023-00475-6
DO - 10.1007/s10494-023-00475-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85169823248
SN - 1386-6184
JO - Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
JF - Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
ER -