Abstract
Looks at N v ACCG. The Supreme Court has pronounced definitively upon what the Court of Protection (CoP) should do where there is a dispute between the providers or funders of health or social services for a person lacking the capacity to make the decision for himself as to what services should be provided to him. The decision puts beyond doubt the limits of both the CoP and, more broadly, what can be done in the name of best interests.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 543-546 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Family Law |
Volume | 2017 |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2017 |