Best interests, available options, and case management before the Court of Protection: N v ACCG

Alexander Ruck Keene, Sophie Miles, Neil Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Looks at N v ACCG. The Supreme Court has pronounced definitively upon what the Court of Protection (CoP) should do where there is a dispute between the providers or funders of health or social services for a person lacking the capacity to make the decision for himself as to what services should be provided to him. The decision puts beyond doubt the limits of both the CoP and, more broadly, what can be done in the name of best interests.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)543-546
Number of pages4
JournalFamily Law
Volume2017
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Best interests, available options, and case management before the Court of Protection: N v ACCG'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this