Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 10

  • W S A Smellie
  • , N Shaw
  • , R Bowley
  • , M F Stewart
  • , A M Kelly
  • , P J Twomey
  • , P R Chadwick
  • , J B Houghton
  • , J P Ng
  • , A J McCulloch
  • Bishop Auckland General Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

This tenth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) antenatal testing in pregnant women; (ii) estimated glomerular filtration rate calculation; (iii) safety testing for methotrexate; and (iv) blood glucose measurement in diabetes. The review is presented in question-answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a precis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1195-204
Number of pages10
JournalJournal Of Clinical Pathology
Volume60
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2007

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Blood Glucose/analysis
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis
  • Drug Monitoring/methods
  • Female
  • Glomerular Filtration Rate
  • Humans
  • Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects
  • Methotrexate/adverse effects
  • Patient Selection
  • Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Care/methods
  • Primary Health Care/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Best practice in primary care pathology: review 10'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this