Better Care and Better Value for Canadians: A Review of RCT Studies of Nurse Interventions

Gina Browne, Stephen Birch, Lehana Thabane

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This review is focused on the effectiveness of nursing interventions for patient outcomes and healthcare costs. It was guided by ecological and economic evaluation frameworks. Restricting the first-tier search of over 4,000 articles to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) yielded 203 studies and 9 additional trials that used identical methods of cost evaluation. Of 212 RCTs, 37 met the eligibility criteria. Of the 37 articles, 29 came from the literature search and 8 came from the first author's research unit, which used identical methods of economic evaluation. Of the first 29 studies, 26 found that nurse interventions were more or equally effective and less or equally costly compared to usual care, as was true of 7 of the 9 RCTs with comprehensive economic evaluations. It is effective and efficient to deploy specialty-trained nurses to lead teams of professionals, including physicians, assembled to address complex patient needs. A nurse-led model of proactive and supplemental care for the chronically ill, versus the on-demand, physician-led model now in place, would be more or equally effective and less or equally costly.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)41-60
    Number of pages20
    JournalCanadian Journal of Nursing Research
    Volume47
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Better Care and Better Value for Canadians: A Review of RCT Studies of Nurse Interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this