Better Off: When Should Pervasive Displays be Powered Down?

Nigel Davies, Sarah Clinch, Mateusz Mikusz, Oliver Bates, Helen Turner, Adrian Friday

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    223 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Digital displays are a ubiquitous feature of our public spaces
    – both ever present, and “always on”. In this paper we
    use a combination of literature survey, experimental work,
    and stakeholder interviews to consider if maximising the
    amount of time such displays are powered on is truly advantageous.
    We challenge existing practice by considering arguments
    from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders (viewers,
    passers-by, content creators and signage owners), and
    identify multiple facets for consideration including levels of
    attention, cognitive load, impact on social interactions, energy
    and financial costs, advertising revenue, perceptions of
    failure and the pressures of creating valuable content.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis 2017)
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4503-5045-7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 9 Jun 2017

    Keywords

    • pervasive displays
    • viewer attention
    • calm computing

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Better Off: When Should Pervasive Displays be Powered Down?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this