Beyond steric selectivity of ions using ångström-scale capillaries

Goutham Solleti, Ashok Keerthi, Abdulghani Ismail, Ankit Bhardwaj, Hossein Jalali, Yi You, Yiheng Li, Nasim Hassani, Haoke Peng, Marcos Vinicius Surmani Martins, Fengchao Wang, Mehdi Neek-amal, Radha Boya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ion-selective channels play a key role in physiological processes and are used in many technologies. Although biological channels can efficiently separate same-charge ions with similar hydration shells, it remains a challenge to mimic such exquisite selectivity using artificial solid-state channels. Although there are several nanoporous membranes that show high selectivity with respect to certain ions, the underlying mechanisms are based on the hydrated ion size and/or charge. There is a need to rationalize the design of artificial channels to make them capable of selecting between similar-sized same-charge ions, which, in turn, requires an understanding of why and how such selectivity can occur. Here we study ångström-scale artificial channels made by van der Waals assembly, which are comparable in size with typical ions and carry little residual charge on the channel walls. This allows us to exclude the first-order effects of steric- and Coulomb-based exclusion. We show that the studied two-dimensional ångström-scale capillaries can distinguish between same-charge ions with similar hydrated diameters. The selectivity is attributed to different positions occupied by ions within the layered structure of nanoconfined water, which depend on the ion-core size and differ for anions and cations. The revealed mechanism points at the possibilities of ion separation beyond simple steric sieving.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNature Nanotechnology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2023

Keywords

  • cond-mat.mes-hall

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond steric selectivity of ions using ångström-scale capillaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this