Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models

Oscar Florez Vargas, Oscar Flórez-Vargas, Andy Brass, George Karystianis, Michael Bramhall, Robert Stevens, Sheena Cruickshank, Goran Nenadic

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    107 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Lack of accurate method reporting is one of the primary causes of irreproducibility in biomedical research. In animal-based biomedical research, both sex and age affect the disease phenotypes; modifying their susceptibility, presentation and response to treatment. Here we look at these two variables by using text-mining across available full text articles that report investigations where mice were the focus of the study. We found that, although there is an improvement during the last two decades, the lack of reporting of these variables is still a concern; only about 50% of the papers published in 2014 stated these variables. In addition, we observed a sex-bias variability according to the field of study. We hope that this text-mining strategy can be taken as a starting point for future more focused assessment of literature, both in preclinical and clinical studies, and thus impact on the reproducibility of findings and on future study validity.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere13615
    JournaleLife
    Volume5
    Issue number0
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Mar 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bias in the reporting of sex and age in biomedical research on mouse models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this