Bolshevisation, stalinisation and party ritual: The congresses of the Communist Party of Great Britain 1920-43

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines the national congresses of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) in the period of the Communist International (1919-43). Both in Britain and internationally, communist party congresses in this period lost any independent decision-making role and became a mechanism activated and controlled from above. Not surprisingly, they have attracted little serious scholarly notice in their own right but this paper identifies three themes deserving consideration: first, that of the congress as a field of tension between inherited notions of delegatory democracy and the Comintern’s top-down version of democratic centralism; second, that of its growing importance as a site of symbolic demonstration and ritualised group action; and third, is that of bolshevisation and stalinisation as processes that can be traced through these changing conceptions of the congress’s role. Each theme is considered here in a separate section. These employ a three-party periodisation that supports an argument of the CPGB’s early but protracted bolshevisation. Further watershed moments in the late 1920s and mid-1930s can both in different ways be identified with stalinisation. These, however, did not so much resolve as displace the tensions with wider labour movement practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-182
Number of pages42
JournalLabour History Review
Volume87
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jan 2022

Keywords

  • Communist Party of Great Britain
  • party congresses
  • democratic centralism
  • bolshevisation
  • stalinisation
  • political ritual

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bolshevisation, stalinisation and party ritual: The congresses of the Communist Party of Great Britain 1920-43'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this