Bradley and Moore on Common Sense

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


It is well appreciated that Moore, in the final years of the nineteenth century, emphatically rejected the monistic idealism of F. H. Bradley. It has, however, been less widely noticed that Moore’s concern to defeat monism remained with him well into the 1920s. In the following discussion I describe the role that Moore’s adoption of a ‘common sense’ orientation played in his criticisms of Bradley’s monism. I begin by outlining certain distinctive features of Bradley’s sceptical methodology, before describing the contrasting approach of Moore as it appears in 1910-11 and 1925. I bring these methodological differences into relief by assessing the status of common sense claims in the work of each figure. I show that Moore’s common sense methodology was employed against Bradley’s monistic conclusions, and that it was adopted with Bradley squarely in mind.
Original languageEnglish
JournalIdealistic Studies
Issue number3
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 21 Sep 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Bradley and Moore on Common Sense'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this