Brandom and Quine on Perspectivally Hybrid De Re Attitude Ascription: A Solution to a Problem in the Explanation of Action

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In Making it Explicit Robert Brandom claims that perspectivally hybrid de re attitude ascriptions explain what an agent actually did, from the point of view of the ascriber, whether or not that was what the agent intended to do. There is a well-known problem, however, first brought to attention by Quine, but curiously ignored by Brandom, that threatens to undermine the role of de re ascriptions in the explanation of action, a problem that stems directly from the fact that, unlike de dicto ascriptions, they permit the attribution of inconsistent attitudes to agents. I propose a solution to the problem which I believe is consistent with Brandom’s approach to the nature of intentionality and the explanation of action.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-121
JournalJournal of Transcendental Philosophy
Volume3
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2022

Keywords

  • de re attitude ascription, action explanation, Robert Brandom, belief fragmentation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brandom and Quine on Perspectivally Hybrid De Re Attitude Ascription: A Solution to a Problem in the Explanation of Action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this