Abstract
Historically transformer insulation design is based on experience with mineral oil (MO). The Basic Insulation Level (BIL) determines the Lightning Impulse Withstand Level (LIWL) for a specific design. These design values are not necessarily appliable to other insulating liquids than MO. There are few published studies on BIL using non-mineral-based liquids in design-relevant insulation geometries. The present study compares Lightning Impulse (LI) breakdown voltages of a synthetic ester liquid (SE) and a Gas-to-Liquid (GTL) oil with those of MO using winding conductors as electrode geometries. The field enhancement factors for the bare electrodes were below 4.1 in all cases indicating the quasi-uniform fields. The effects of liquid gap distance, paper wrapping and impulse polarity were all considered. It was found that the LI breakdown voltages of the alternative transformer liquids are comparable to those of the MO. The streamer propagation characteristics during the breakdown process were also captured. The results showed that the breakdowns are led by the fast streamer under positive LI and there is a streamer mode transition under negative LI. The breakdown voltages were found to be practically the same for both polarities, and they barely differed among the three investigated transformer liquids. This is because the breakdowns were dominated by the streamer initiation under the present test electrode geometries and conditions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 5 Jan 2025 |
Keywords
- Transformer liquids
- breakdown voltage
- lightning impulse
- winding conductor
- streamer
- breakdown mechanism