Bringing the critical into doctoral supervisory praxis: What can we learn from debates on epistemic (in)justice and the languaging of research?

Richard Fay, Jane Andrews, Zhuo Min Huang, Ross White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article, we discuss how, as supervisors in largely Anglophone university contexts in England, we are trying to develop supervisory practices informed by the discussions of epistemic (in)justice and the languaging of research. Having rehearsed these discussions, and considered the opportunities provided by research integrity policy formulations in our context, we conceptualise doctoral supervision critically, interculturally, and ecologically. We then report our efforts to shape the supervisory agenda so that, in the local spaces available to us, the shaping influences of the epistemic and linguistic in the wider research environment are problematised. In particular, we focus on two strands of our thinking, namely: a) the implications of epistemic hierarchies and the value of an intercultural ethic for the transknowledging at the heart of doctoral research; and b) the role of language(s) in research and the value of a translingual researcher mindset. In both strands, our thinking has moved from a more instrumental to a more critical stance regarding research, researcher thinking, and supervision. This development highlights some of the complexities involved in developing critical intercultural praxis for doctoral supervision. We conclude with recommendations—aimed at all those involved in doctoral supervision—to facilitate a critical intercultural supervisory culture.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-127
JournalJournal for Praxis in Higher Education
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Oct 2021

Keywords

  • critical intercultural ethic
  • epistemic injustice
  • translingual mindset
  • supervisory praxis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bringing the critical into doctoral supervisory praxis: What can we learn from debates on epistemic (in)justice and the languaging of research?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • BAAL Conference 2011

    Richard Fay (Participant)

    1 Sept 20113 Sept 2011

    Activity: Participating in or organising event(s)Participating in a conference, workshop, exhibition, performance, inquiry, course etcResearch

Cite this