‘By Fraud and Collusion’: Feudal Revenue and Enforcement of the Statute of Marlborough, 1267–1526

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Following the Statute of Marlborough 1267, feoffments which were designed to deprive lords of wardship could in some circumstances be deemed ‘collusive’ or ‘fraudulent’. This was further complicated from the mid-fourteenth century onwards by the common practice of creating uses to circumvent the common law rules prohibiting the devise of land by last will. The effect of uses being created to perform last wills was that lords, in particular the king, were losing out on their feudal incidents. The current view, put forward by legal historians, is that the Crown struggled to enforce the Statute of Marlborough after 1410, and that the ‘campaign’ against this loss of feudal revenue began in the 1520s. This article seeks to re-examine this view, particularly in relation to how Marlborough and collusion were understood and the Crown’s approach to the avoidance of feudal incidents before the Statute of Uses 1536.
Original languageEnglish
Article number3
Pages (from-to)65-89
Number of pages25
JournalThe Journal of Legal History
Volume42
Issue number1
Early online date8 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Uses
  • chancery
  • collusion
  • feudal incidents
  • fraud
  • inquisitions post mortem
  • trusts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘By Fraud and Collusion’: Feudal Revenue and Enforcement of the Statute of Marlborough, 1267–1526'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this