TY - JOUR
T1 - Calculation of the permeability in porous media using the lattice Boltzmann method
AU - Eshghinejadfard, Amir
AU - Daróczy, László
AU - Janiga, Gábor
AU - Thévenin, Dominique
PY - 2016/12
Y1 - 2016/12
N2 - In this paper, the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is used to simulate three-dimensional laminar flows in porous media and to calculate the associated permeability. An in-house, parallelized code using the message passing interface technique is employed for the study. Three different flow configurations are studied: first, by manually specifying solid cells in a face-centered cube (FCC); then, doing the same in a body-centered cube (BCC); and finally by reading the solid cells for a real 3D geometry from a set of experimental 2D computed tomography images. In all simulations, the Reynolds number is kept well below 1. It was found that the current LBM simulations yield good estimates for the permeability value. The impact of the employed force scheme and single- or multiple-relaxation time (SRT, MRT) was also studied. Although each force scheme (Guo-SRT, Guo-MRT and Shan-Chen-SRT) may show better results in some regions, the strong dependency of SRT models on relaxation time suggests that the proper choice of the force scheme, relaxation time and domain resolution is a compromise between the required accuracy and computational cost. First, higher resolutions lead as expected to increasingly accurate results but requires more computational cost and time. Second, the MRT model shows a lower viscosity dependence in comparison with SRT models but is somewhat slower. Also, the results are more sensitive to the relaxation time value for coarser domains. Furthermore, lower relaxation times necessitate a higher number of iterations to reach the steady state. It was also observed that permeability of both FCC and BCC structures are very close at large porosities. The last test case with the real geometry demonstrates that LB simulations can deliver the hydrodynamic properties in a 3D porous media, a very challenging issue for solvers when relying on classical Navier-Stokes equations.
AB - In this paper, the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is used to simulate three-dimensional laminar flows in porous media and to calculate the associated permeability. An in-house, parallelized code using the message passing interface technique is employed for the study. Three different flow configurations are studied: first, by manually specifying solid cells in a face-centered cube (FCC); then, doing the same in a body-centered cube (BCC); and finally by reading the solid cells for a real 3D geometry from a set of experimental 2D computed tomography images. In all simulations, the Reynolds number is kept well below 1. It was found that the current LBM simulations yield good estimates for the permeability value. The impact of the employed force scheme and single- or multiple-relaxation time (SRT, MRT) was also studied. Although each force scheme (Guo-SRT, Guo-MRT and Shan-Chen-SRT) may show better results in some regions, the strong dependency of SRT models on relaxation time suggests that the proper choice of the force scheme, relaxation time and domain resolution is a compromise between the required accuracy and computational cost. First, higher resolutions lead as expected to increasingly accurate results but requires more computational cost and time. Second, the MRT model shows a lower viscosity dependence in comparison with SRT models but is somewhat slower. Also, the results are more sensitive to the relaxation time value for coarser domains. Furthermore, lower relaxation times necessitate a higher number of iterations to reach the steady state. It was also observed that permeability of both FCC and BCC structures are very close at large porosities. The last test case with the real geometry demonstrates that LB simulations can deliver the hydrodynamic properties in a 3D porous media, a very challenging issue for solvers when relying on classical Navier-Stokes equations.
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2016.05.010
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2016.05.010
DO - 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2016.05.010
M3 - Article
SN - 0142-727X
VL - 62
SP - 93
EP - 103
JO - International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
JF - International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
IS - Part A
ER -