Abstract
This article analyses how Callimachus was cited in ancient scholarship on Pindar. A survey of references to literary authors in the scholia establishes that commentaries provided only minimal specification of relations between the texts concerned. Despite this, commentaries were important intertextual sites. In providing information that supplements Pindar's texts, citations of Callimachus contribute to the latter's canonical status by treating his poetry as an authoritative source of mythological and historical details. The juxtaposition of the two authors in commentaries also allowed for an exploration of their literary relationship.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 152–177 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Cambridge Classical Journal |
| Volume | 59 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |