Can DSM-V facilitate productive research into the somatoform disorders?

Francis Creed

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objective: To highlight key research issues relevant to the diagnostic classification of somatoform disorders and assess whether DSM-V can facilitate research. Methods: A selective review of recent research findings in relation to the diagnostic categories of somatization disorder and hypochondriasis. Results: The DSM-IV criteria have been ignored by researchers as they were either too restrictive or too broad to study the associated features of somatization and hypochondriasis. In view of the linear relationship between number of bodily symptoms and impairment, the appropriate cutoff point has yet to be established. Ongoing research highlights the perceptual and cognitive aspects of these disorders, which need to be researched further in order to improve management. Conclusion: DSM-IV did not facilitate research. Its successor should enable longitudinal studies to further elucidate the causes and perpetuating factors of somatization and illness worry rather than limit such studies by producing artificial criteria that may not be supported by subsequent research. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)331-334
    Number of pages3
    JournalJournal of psychosomatic research
    Volume60
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

    Keywords

    • Diagnostic criteria
    • Hypochondriasis
    • Somatoform disorders

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Can DSM-V facilitate productive research into the somatoform disorders?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this