Abstract
We document substantial increases in corporate security offerings during the COVID pandemic. While the increase in seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) can be attributed to shifts in macroeconomic conditions, increases in convertible and straight bond offerings cannot be explained by standard security choice determinants. We furthermore find that COVID-period SEO announcements are often contaminated with Research and Development (R&D)-related news, with the SEO proceeds more likely to be hoarded as cash. Overall, COVID-period SEOs align with market timing behavior, but the increase in COVID-period convertibles and straight bonds cannot be reconciled with pre-pandemic corporate financing rationales or government interventions. We furthermore demonstrate that the COVID pandemic differs substantially from the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in terms of security offering choices and announcement returns.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Empirical Finance |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can existing corporate finance theories explain security offerings during the COVID-19 pandemic?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver