Can guidelines rein in oxygen use? A retrospective cross-sectional study using routinely collected data

Usman Talat, Kelly Schmitdke, Saval Khanal, Alice Turner, Ivo Vlaev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background. Oxygen is one of the most commonly used emergency therapies. Like other therapies, oxygen can cause harm if used inappropriately. During the COVID-19 pandemic, guidelines were released to optimise oxygen and medication use. In the current study, we examine whether oxygen and medication use during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was in concordance with new guidelines.

Methods. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using routinely collected data from [ANON] Trust in England. Patients were admitted between April 2020 and September 2020, were over the age of 18 years, and had a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. To assess adherence to the oxygen guidelines (i.e., SpO2 adherence), the percentage of times oxygen therapy was administered within, over, and under guideline specifications were calculated for patients overall, and then for patients with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/pulmonary disease separately. Next, two multinomial regression analyses were conducted to assess whether clinical processes, pre-admission diagnoses, and other demographic factors were related to oxygen use. Analysis 1 included patients not diagnosed with COPD/pulmonary disease. Analysis 2 included patients diagnosed with COPD/pulmonary disease. Results are reported as tallies, percentages, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. To assess adherence to a new medication guideline, the percentage of patients administered oxygen and dexamethasone was calculated for those admitted after the 25th of June 2020.

Results. The overall number of patients included in our SpO2 adherence analyses was 8,751 (female = 4,168). Oxygen was used within guideline specifications less than half the time, i.e., 41.6% (n=3,638/8,751); non-adherence involving under-administering (3.5%, n=304/8,751) was markedly lower than over-administering (55.0%, n=4,809/8,751). Adherence was higher for patients without COPD (43.7%, n=3,383/7,741) than with COPD (25.2%, n=255/1,010). Under-administering was low across groups (non-COPD 3.5%, n=274/7,741 and COPD 2.9%, n=30/1,010). Over-administering was markedly lower for non-COPD (52.3%, n=4,084/7,741) than COPD (71.8%, n=725/1,010) patients. Diagnoses associated with over-administering varied across the groups. Regarding the dexamethasone guidelines, of the 6,397 patients admitted after the 24th of June, only 12.6% (n=805) received dexamethasone.

Conclusions. Suboptimal use of oxygen and medication were common during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. As found in previous studies, over-administering was more common than under-administering. The new guidelines issued during the COVID-19 pandemic were not by themselves sufficient to optimise oxygen use. Behavioural strategies are explored which may help policymakers optimise oxygen use.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbermzad073
Journal International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume35
Issue number4
Early online date20 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Dec 2023

Keywords

  • emergency care
  • guidelines
  • health policy
  • intensive care
  • oxygen
  • training/education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can guidelines rein in oxygen use? A retrospective cross-sectional study using routinely collected data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this