TY - JOUR
T1 - Can one predict the likely specific orofacial pain syndrome from a self-completed questionnaire?
AU - Macfarlane, Tatiana V.
AU - Blinkhorn, Anthony S.
AU - Craven, Rebecca
AU - Zakrzewska, Joanna M.
AU - Atkin, Philip
AU - Escudier, Michael P.
AU - Amy Rooney, C.
AU - Aggarwal, Vishal
AU - Macfarlane, Gary J.
PY - 2004/10
Y1 - 2004/10
N2 - To estimate the prevalence of orofacial pain (OFP) by specific diagnostic subgroups in the general population. Cross-sectional population study. General medical practice in South East Cheshire, UK. Participants of baseline investigation who completed the full postal questionnaire (1510, adjusted study participation rate 81%). Clinical examination was attended by 126 (43%) of all the participants who reported OFP in the questionnaire. These individuals were classified as musculoligamentous/soft tissue type, dentoalveolar or neurological/vascular. OFP duration, location, descriptors and statements on OFP were predictors of classification group. The estimated prevalence in the general population of musculoligamentous/soft tissue type of OFP was 7%, dentoalveolar 7% and neurological/vascular 6%. This study has derived a statistical model to classify participants with OFP into three broad groups (musculoligamentous/soft tissue, dentoalveolar and neurological/vascular) based on questionnaire information about OFP (OFP chronicity, location and verbal descriptors of pain). It is potentially useful in large population studies of OFP, where a clinical examination is not possible, however, further validation of its performance in large populations are necessary. © 2004 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
AB - To estimate the prevalence of orofacial pain (OFP) by specific diagnostic subgroups in the general population. Cross-sectional population study. General medical practice in South East Cheshire, UK. Participants of baseline investigation who completed the full postal questionnaire (1510, adjusted study participation rate 81%). Clinical examination was attended by 126 (43%) of all the participants who reported OFP in the questionnaire. These individuals were classified as musculoligamentous/soft tissue type, dentoalveolar or neurological/vascular. OFP duration, location, descriptors and statements on OFP were predictors of classification group. The estimated prevalence in the general population of musculoligamentous/soft tissue type of OFP was 7%, dentoalveolar 7% and neurological/vascular 6%. This study has derived a statistical model to classify participants with OFP into three broad groups (musculoligamentous/soft tissue, dentoalveolar and neurological/vascular) based on questionnaire information about OFP (OFP chronicity, location and verbal descriptors of pain). It is potentially useful in large population studies of OFP, where a clinical examination is not possible, however, further validation of its performance in large populations are necessary. © 2004 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
KW - General population
KW - Orofacial pain
KW - Pain diagnosis
KW - Prevalence
U2 - 10.1016/j.pain.2004.07.002
DO - 10.1016/j.pain.2004.07.002
M3 - Article
SN - 0304-3959
VL - 111
SP - 270
EP - 277
JO - Pain
JF - Pain
IS - 3
ER -