Capturing complexities of student leadership: knowledge, power and practicalities

Patricia M. Davies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Over the past decade student participation in school leadership has gained prominence in the field of education. However, the concept of ‘student leadership’ remains broad and elusive, allowing many school leaders to misuse it in ways that serve their own needs. Student leadership is defined here as student participation in activities which promote self-advocacy (Lansdown, 2000: 16). There are very few studies which actually examine the relationship between student leadership and school decision-making. This paper reports on a case study of student-led project at an independent high school in England. The students lead a consortium of teachers and administrators at the school to draw up policy recommendation on learning with ICT at the school, which are forwarded to the school’s senior management team. Using the case study as reference, this paper argues that student leadership although full of hopes and aspirations for the future of education, is at present fraught with complexities. These include issues of knowledge: when the roles of learner and teacher are reversed, power: based on who decided what is included in the agendas, and practicalities such as time and resources.Lansdown, G. (2000). Promoting children’s participation in democratic decision-making. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Center.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationhost publication
Publication statusPublished - 4 Sept 2012
EventBERA 2012 Annual Conference - University of Manchester
Duration: 4 Sept 20126 Sept 2012

Conference

ConferenceBERA 2012 Annual Conference
CityUniversity of Manchester
Period4/09/126/09/12

Keywords

  • student voice
  • participation
  • leadership

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Capturing complexities of student leadership: knowledge, power and practicalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this