TY - JOUR
T1 - Caring through distancing
T2 - Spatial boundaries and proximities in the cystic fibrosis clinic
AU - Brown, Nik
AU - Nettleton, Sarah
AU - Martin, Daryl
AU - Lewis, Alan
A2 - Buse, Christina
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to express particular gratitude to our three partner cystic fibrosis clinics, to the artist Lynne Chapman and to our microbiology colleagues Prof. Craig Winstanley (Liverpool, UK) and Prof. Mike Brockhurst (Manchester, UK). Our research was funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), and the University of York and Wellcome Trust funded Centre for Future Health (CFH).
Funding Information:
We explore these issues drawing on data from ?Pathways, practices and architectures: containing antimicrobial resistance in the cystic fibrosis clinic? (PARC), a UK Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) funded study (AH/R002037/1) that examined practices, pathways and architectures in three CF clinics, conducted 2018?2020, completed immediately prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study used qualitative methods including graphic interviews, walking interviews and ethnographic observations, examining the experiences of patients and staff (Brown et al., 2019). We begin by looking at staff practices of distancing, and how they can be viewed as part of personalised ?care in place? (Ivanova et al., 2016). We then examine patient strategies of distancing as an ?ethic of care?, involving a sense of responsibility and caring about the ?distant other? (Milligan and Wiles 2010, p.741). These practices depend on the support of a diverse range of actors and materials, as part of a wider ?care assemblage? (Dombroski et al., 2016; Fox 2011; Locock et al., 2016). Yet tensions and dilemmas emerge between distance, proximity and care. The paper concludes by considering implications for design and for the COVID-19 pandemic.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/11/17
Y1 - 2020/11/17
N2 - This paper re-examines relations between proximity, distance and care, focusing on practices of ‘distancing’ in the cystic fibrosis (CF) clinic. While care is often thought of in terms of proximity, literature on ‘landscapes of care’ highlights the potential for ‘care at a distance’. We extend this literature to examine practices of social distancing, specifically the act of maintaining a ‘space between’ bodies in communal areas – a practice currently brought to the fore by the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the CF clinic as a case study, we examine how distancing can be understood as an emplaced practice of care, shaped by – and shaping - architectures and materialities in particular contexts. We explore these issues drawing on data from Pathways, practices and architectures: containing antimicrobial resistance in the cystic fibrosis clinic, a UK AHRC funded study (AH/R002037/1) examining practices in three cystic fibrosis clinics using visual and ethnographic methods. Clinical staff practices of maintaining distancing were often regarded by patients as ‘care-ful’, part of personalised ‘care in place’, embroiling a wider care assemblage including ancillary staff, materialities and architectures. Patients also actively participate in distancing as an ‘ethic of care’, using strategies of ‘holding back’ and ‘looking out’ in confined spaces. Yet ourfindings also highlight tensions between care, proximity and distance in circulation spaces and communal areas, including transient spaces where the assemblage of care breaks down. The article concludes by considering wider implications for healthcare design and for the COVID-19 pandemic.
AB - This paper re-examines relations between proximity, distance and care, focusing on practices of ‘distancing’ in the cystic fibrosis (CF) clinic. While care is often thought of in terms of proximity, literature on ‘landscapes of care’ highlights the potential for ‘care at a distance’. We extend this literature to examine practices of social distancing, specifically the act of maintaining a ‘space between’ bodies in communal areas – a practice currently brought to the fore by the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the CF clinic as a case study, we examine how distancing can be understood as an emplaced practice of care, shaped by – and shaping - architectures and materialities in particular contexts. We explore these issues drawing on data from Pathways, practices and architectures: containing antimicrobial resistance in the cystic fibrosis clinic, a UK AHRC funded study (AH/R002037/1) examining practices in three cystic fibrosis clinics using visual and ethnographic methods. Clinical staff practices of maintaining distancing were often regarded by patients as ‘care-ful’, part of personalised ‘care in place’, embroiling a wider care assemblage including ancillary staff, materialities and architectures. Patients also actively participate in distancing as an ‘ethic of care’, using strategies of ‘holding back’ and ‘looking out’ in confined spaces. Yet ourfindings also highlight tensions between care, proximity and distance in circulation spaces and communal areas, including transient spaces where the assemblage of care breaks down. The article concludes by considering wider implications for healthcare design and for the COVID-19 pandemic.
KW - Architectures
KW - Boundary work
KW - Care
KW - Cystic fibrosis
KW - Distancing
KW - Infection prevention
KW - Materialities
KW - Place
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097109076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113531
DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113531
M3 - Article
SN - 0277-9536
VL - 265
JO - Social Science & Medicine
JF - Social Science & Medicine
M1 - 113531
ER -