Case-based seminars in medical ethics education: How medical students define and discuss moral problems

Thomas Donaldson, Elizabeth Fistein, Michael Dunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Discussion of real cases encountered by medical students has been advocated as a component of medical ethics education. Suggested benefits include: a focus on the actual problems that medical students confront; active learner involvement; and facilitation of an exploration of the meaning of their own values in relation to professional behaviour. However, the approach may also carry risks: students may focus too narrowly on particular clinical topics or show a preference for discussing legal problems that may appear to have clearer solutions. Teaching may therefore omit areas generally considered to be important components of the curriculum. In this paper, the authors present an analysis of the moral problems raised by medical students in response to a request to describe ethically problematic cases they had encountered during two clinical attachments, for the purpose of educational discussion at case-based seminars. We discuss the problems raised and compare the content of the cases to the UK Consensus Statement on core content of learning. The authors also describe the approaches that the students used to undertake an initial analysis of the problems raised, and consider possible implications for the development of medical ethics education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)816-820
Number of pages5
JournalJ Med Ethics
Volume36
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Case-based seminars in medical ethics education: How medical students define and discuss moral problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this