Abstract
40 high vocabulary age and 40 low vocabulary age retarded adults were given a randomly ordered list of 16 categorically related items in a 5 trial, free recall task. Half the subjects in each group were given category cues; the remainder were given no clustering assistance. Cues increased clustering for both groups, but only the high vocabulary age group showed increased recall. 24 hr later all subjects received a second randomly ordered categorizable list, and no cues were given. Previous exposure to cues did not affect performance on this list. It is concluded that a failure to code items with respect to category labels at presentation may prevent low vocabulary age subjects from using a clustering strategy efficiently, whereas high vocabulary age subjects can use such a strategy efficiently but have difficulties in initiating it for themselves.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 419-425 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | American journal of mental deficiency |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 1974 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Category cues in free recall: retarded adults of two vocabulary age levels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver