Causal beliefs and behaviour change post-myocardial infarction: How are they related?

David P. French, Delyth James, Rob Horne, John Weinman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Introduction. Weinman, Petrie, Sharpe, and Walker (2000) showed that the causal attributions of a sample of first-time myocardial infarction (MI) patients and their spouses from Auckland, New Zealand, were associated with changes in health-related behaviour over the first 6 months post-MI. However, their analyses did not control for pre-MI health-related behaviour. Method. This paper reports a re-analyses of the Auckland data, and a replication study conducted with 155 first-time MI patients in Brighton, United Kingdom (UK), to investigate whether baseline attributions for MI were related to health-related behaviour change at 6 months (N = 132). Spouses (N = 85) also completed the attribution questionnaire at baseline. Results. There was no consistent relationship between the causal attributions of patients and subsequent behaviour change in Auckland and Brighton. For both samples, causal attributions were associated with pre-MI behaviour. Conclusions. The data from both samples suggest that the causal attributions of MI patients and their spouses may be realistic, but not predictive of subsequent changes in behaviour. © 2005 The British Psychological Society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)167-182
    Number of pages15
    JournalBritish Journal of Health Psychology
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2005

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Causal beliefs and behaviour change post-myocardial infarction: How are they related?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this