CEO Accountability for Corporate Fraud: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China

Jiandong Chen, Wenxuan Hou, Douglas Cumming, Edward Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We use institutional-related theories and a unique natural experiment that enables an exogenous test of the influence of controlling shareholders on managerial accountability to corporate fraud. In China, prior to the Split Share Structure Reform (SSSR), state shareholders held restricted shares that could not be traded. This restriction mitigated state-owned enterprise controlling shareholders’ incentives to monitor managers. The data examined show the SSSR strengthens incentives of state-owned enterprise controlling shareholders to replace fraudulent management. Our findings support the view that economic incentives are important to promote corporate governance and deter fraud.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume138
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CEO Accountability for Corporate Fraud: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this