Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient and T2 relaxation during radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Warren D. Foltz*, Andy Wu, Peter Chung, Charles Catton, Andrew Bayley, Michael Milosevic, Robert Bristow, Padraig Warde, Anna Simeonov, David A. Jaffray, Masoom A. Haider, Cynthia Ménard

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate regional and temporal changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2 relaxation during radiation therapy (RT) in patients with low and intermediate risk localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Seventeen patients enrolled on a prospective clinical trial where MRI was acquired every 2 weeks throughout eight weeks of image-guided prostate IMRT (78 Gy/39 fractions). ADC and T2 quantification used entire prostate, central gland, benign peripheral zone, and tumor-dense regions-of-interest, and mean values were evaluated for common response trends. Results: Overall, the RT responses were greater than volunteer measurement repeatability, and week 6 appeared to be an optimum time-point for early detection. RT effects on the entire prostate were best detected using ADC (5-7% by week 2, P < 0.0125), effects on peripheral zone were best detected using T2 (19% reduction at week 6; P = 0.004) and effects on tumors were best detected using ADC (14% elevation at week 6; P = 0.004). Conclusion: ADC and T2 may be candidate biomarkers of early response to RT warranting further investigation against clinical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)909-916
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Oct 2012

Keywords

  • ADC
  • prostate cancer
  • radiation therapy
  • T
  • treatment response

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Cancer Research Centre

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient and T2 relaxation during radiotherapy for prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this