Changes in patient experiences of primary care during health service reforms in England between 2003 and 2007

Stephen M. Campbell, Evangelos Kontopantelis, David Reeves, Jose M. Valderas, Ella Gaehl, Nicola Small, Martin O. Roland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    109 Downloads (Pure)


    PURPOSE: Major primary care reforms have been introduced in recent years in the United Kingdom, including financial incentives to improve clinical quality and provide more rapid access to care. Little is known about the impact of these changes on patient experience. We examine patient reports of quality of care between 2003 and 2007, including random samples of patients on practice lists and patients with long-term conditions. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional design study of family practices in which questionnaires were sent to serial samples of patients in 42 representative general practices in England. Questionnaires sent to samples of patients with chronic disease (asthma, angina, and diabetes) and random samples of adult patients (excluding patients who reported any long-term condition) in 2003, 2005, and 2007 addressed issues of access, communication, continuity of care, coordination, nursing care, and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in quality of care reported by either group of patients between 2003 and 2007 for communication, nursing care, coordination, and overall satisfaction. Some aspects of access improved significantly for patients with chronic disease, but not for the random samples of patients. Patients in both samples reported seeing their usual physician less often and gave lower satisfaction ratings for continuity of care. Most scores were significantly higher for the chronic illness samples than for the random samples of patients in 2003, even after adjusting for age. CONCLUSIONS: There was a modest improvement in access to care for patients with chronic illness, but all patients now find it somewhat harder to obtain continuity of care. This outcome may be related to the incentives to provide rapid appointments or to the increased number of specialized clinics in primary care. The possibility of unintended effects needs to be considered when introducing pay for performance schemes.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)499-506
    Number of pages7
    JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
    Issue number6
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010


    • Continuity of patient care
    • Delivery of health care
    • Family practice
    • Patient satisfaction


    Dive into the research topics of 'Changes in patient experiences of primary care during health service reforms in England between 2003 and 2007'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this