Characterisation and impact of reported and unreported exacerbations: results from ATTAIN.

Paul W Jones, Rosa Lamarca, Ferran Chuecos, Dave Singh, Alvar Agustí, Eric D Bateman, Gonzalo de Miquel, Cynthia Caracta, Esther Garcia Gil

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    The frequency and impact of exacerbations identified using healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) or the EXAcerbations of Chronic pulmonary disease Tool (EXACT) were compared prospectively in a 24-week, phase III trial (ATTAIN). Patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease received twice-daily aclidinium 200 μg, aclidinium 400 μg or placebo. All HCRU events were reported to physicians. "EXACT-identified" events were categorised as "EXACT-reported" (detected by EXACT and reported to the physician) and "EXACT-unreported" (detected but not reported). Health status was measured using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Annualised EXACT-identified event rates were higher in all study arms (placebo 1.39, aclidinium 200 μg 1.00 and aclidinium 400 μg 0.98 per patient per year) versus HCRU (placebo 0.60, aclidinium 200 μg 0.43 and aclidinium 400 μg 0.40 per patient per year). Concordance between methods was low (kappa 0.16). Aclidinium reduced EXACT-identified events (rate ratio versus placebo: aclidinium 200 μg 0.72 and aclidinium 400 μg 0.71; both p
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalThe European respiratory journal
    Publication statusPublished - 18 Sept 2014


    Dive into the research topics of 'Characterisation and impact of reported and unreported exacerbations: results from ATTAIN.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this