TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterisation of blink dynamics using a high-speed infrared imaging system
AU - Navascues Cornago, Maria
AU - Morgan, Philip
AU - Maldonado-Codina, Carole
AU - Read, Michael
N1 - Funding Information:
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors acknowledge the assistance of clinical, logistical and administrative colleagues at Eurolens Research in the acquisition of data for this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2020 The College of Optometrists
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - Purpose: Development and validation of a non-invasive imaging system to capture spontaneous blinking and characterise blink dynamics using a custom image analysis algorithm. Methods: A pilot study investigated the influence of illumination type on blink dynamics. Spontaneous blinking was recorded in eight subjects using a high- speed camera under two illumination conditions: white light and infrared. Custom semi-automated software assessed palpebral aperture height (PAH), blink rate, blink speed, blink completeness and blink duration. The main clinical study compared two different image analysis techniques. Spontaneous blinking was recorded in 20 subjects using a high-speed infrared camera. Blink speed and duration were determined using two techniques: manual tracking and semi-automated tracking. Agreement between the two techniques was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Coefficients of repeatability (COR) were calculated for the semi-automated technique.
Results: There were significant differences between white light and infrared illumination for PAH (p < 0.0001), blink rate (p = 0.04), closing speed (p = 0.009), opening speed (p < 0.0001) and blink duration (p = 0.0003). The mean differences (95% limits of agreement) between the two techniques were 0.6 mm/s (-15.9 to 17.0) closing speed, 1.5 mm/s (-6.8 to 9.8) opening speed, 2.4 ms (-6.8 to 11.5) closed phase duration and 5.0 ms (-19.4 to 29.3) total blink duration. COR values were 10.1 mm/s closing speed, 3.7 mm/s opening speed, 6.7 ms closed phase duration and 11.2 ms total blink duration. Conclusions: This study has shown that spontaneous blinking can be characterised using a non-invasive imaging system. The semi-automated analysis pro- vides a rapid characterisation of blink dynamics, allowing its application in large-scale trials in a number of clinical areas.
AB - Purpose: Development and validation of a non-invasive imaging system to capture spontaneous blinking and characterise blink dynamics using a custom image analysis algorithm. Methods: A pilot study investigated the influence of illumination type on blink dynamics. Spontaneous blinking was recorded in eight subjects using a high- speed camera under two illumination conditions: white light and infrared. Custom semi-automated software assessed palpebral aperture height (PAH), blink rate, blink speed, blink completeness and blink duration. The main clinical study compared two different image analysis techniques. Spontaneous blinking was recorded in 20 subjects using a high-speed infrared camera. Blink speed and duration were determined using two techniques: manual tracking and semi-automated tracking. Agreement between the two techniques was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Coefficients of repeatability (COR) were calculated for the semi-automated technique.
Results: There were significant differences between white light and infrared illumination for PAH (p < 0.0001), blink rate (p = 0.04), closing speed (p = 0.009), opening speed (p < 0.0001) and blink duration (p = 0.0003). The mean differences (95% limits of agreement) between the two techniques were 0.6 mm/s (-15.9 to 17.0) closing speed, 1.5 mm/s (-6.8 to 9.8) opening speed, 2.4 ms (-6.8 to 11.5) closed phase duration and 5.0 ms (-19.4 to 29.3) total blink duration. COR values were 10.1 mm/s closing speed, 3.7 mm/s opening speed, 6.7 ms closed phase duration and 11.2 ms total blink duration. Conclusions: This study has shown that spontaneous blinking can be characterised using a non-invasive imaging system. The semi-automated analysis pro- vides a rapid characterisation of blink dynamics, allowing its application in large-scale trials in a number of clinical areas.
KW - blink speed
KW - eyelids
KW - image analysis
KW - infrared imaging
KW - non-invasive
KW - spontaneous blinking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085574135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/opo.12694
DO - 10.1111/opo.12694
M3 - Article
SN - 0275-5408
VL - 40
SP - 519
EP - 528
JO - Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
JF - Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
IS - 4
ER -