ChlVPP/EVA hybrid versus the weekly VAPEC-B regimen for previously untreated Hodgkin's disease

J. A. Radford, A. Z S Rohatiner, W. D J Ryder, D. P. Deakin, T. Barbui, N. P. Lucie, A. Rossi, D. J. Dunlop, R. A. Cowan, P. M. Wilkinson, R. K. Gupta, R. D. James, J. Shamash, J. Chang, D. Crowther, T. A. Lister

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: To test the hypothesis that a chemotherapy regimen of relatively low toxicity and 11 weeks' duration (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, vin-cristine, bleomycin, and prednisolone [VAPEC-B]) is at least as effective in terms of disease control as 6 months' treatment with chlorambucil, vinblastine, procarbazine, and prednisolone/etoposide, vincristine, and doxorubicin (ChlVPP/EVA hybrid), which is associated with a high risk of permanent sterility. Patients and Methods: Two hundred eighty-two patients with previously untreated Hodgkin's disease, clinical stages I/II (plus mediastinal bulk and/or B symptoms) and clinical stages III/IV were randomized at three United Kingdom and one Italian center to receive either six monthly cycles of ChlVPP/EVA hybrid or 11 weekly cycles of VAPEC-B. After chemotherapy and a restaging evaluation, radiotherapy was administered to sites of previous bulk or residual radiographic abnormality before patients were observed off treatment. Results: Further accrual to the trial was halted at the planned third interim analysis in September 1996. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, freedom from progression (FFP), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) are all significantly better in the population treated with ChlVPP/EVA than VAPEC-B, where the comparative 5-year results are 82% and 62% (FFP), 78% and 58% (EFS), and 89% and 79% (OS), respectively. The superiority of ChlVPP/EVA was seen in both low-risk and intermediate/high-risk patients, although subset analysis suggested that ChlVPP/EVA and VAPEC-B produce equivalent results in the best-prognosis patients (Hasenclever score ≤ 2, nonbulky disease). Conclusion: Apart from possibly in the best-prognosis group, where results are equivalent, ChlVPP/EVA hybrid produces significantly better FFP, EFS, and OS than VAPEC-B in patients with previously untreated Hodgkin's disease. © 2002 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2988-2994
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
    Volume20
    Issue number13
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'ChlVPP/EVA hybrid versus the weekly VAPEC-B regimen for previously untreated Hodgkin's disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this