Chronic forearm pain presents as a transient and indistinct pain site in a community setting: Results from a UK population survey

Dawn Carnes, D. Ashby, S. Parsons, M. Underwood

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objectives. To investigate the prevalence of chronic forearm pain in a non-occupational community setting over a 2-year period. Method. A longitudinal community-based postal questionnaire survey conducted in the south-eastern quadrant of England. Results. We received 2493/4172 (60%) responses at baseline and we followed up 429 of these 2 years later: 252 responded (59%). Forearm pain prevalence was 4% at baseline and 5% at follow-up. Over 95% of those with forearm pain had pain in other areas [odds ratio 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.3-1.7)] and it was most commonly associated with elbow and wrist pain. Seventy-six per cent of those with forearm pain at baseline recovered. At follow-up, 78% of those with chronic forearm pain had new-onset forearm pain. Conclusions. Persistent forearm pain (pain for over 2 years) was rare and the capacity for recovery was good (76%). Isolated forearm pain as a diagnostic category is of little utility. Treating and managing forearm pain in a site-specific manner is unlikely to be successful owing to its strong association with pain in other areas. In the community, forearm pain laterality was not evident; our findings suggest that forearm pain in the workplace is influenced by different factors to those in a community setting. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)197-201
    Number of pages4
    JournalFamily practice
    Volume25
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008

    Keywords

    • Chronic pain
    • Community survey
    • Forearm pain

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Chronic forearm pain presents as a transient and indistinct pain site in a community setting: Results from a UK population survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this