Chronic pelvic pain: A meta-analytic review

Linda P A Mcgowan, David D. Clark-Carter, Marian K. Pitts

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women of reproductive age is a common complaint; for many women no identifiable pathology can be found. Research has suggested that women who have chronic pelvic pain without obvious pathology differ on a range of psychological characteristics, such as anxiety and depression, compared with those with identified pathology. A meta-analysis of 22 studies was undertaken to clarify these issues. Results showed that there were no significant differences on a range of psychological variables between women who were identified, via laparoscopy and clinical judgement, as having organic disorders and those who were not so identified. When women with chronic pelvic pain were compared with pain-free groups a profile of elevated depression, anxiety, neuroticism and psychopathology was found which is consistent with findings from studies of other painful conditions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)937-951
    Number of pages14
    JournalPsychology and Health
    Volume13
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - 1998

    Keywords

    • Abuse
    • Chronic pelvic pain
    • Meta-analysis
    • Psychological morbidity
    • Somatisation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Chronic pelvic pain: A meta-analytic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this