TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical and cost-effectiveness of vaginal pessary self-management compared to clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse: protocol for the TOPSY randomised controlled trial.
T2 - Protocol for the TOPSY randomised controlled trial
AU - Hagen, Suzanne
AU - Kearney, Rohna
AU - Goodman, Kirsteen
AU - Melone, Lynn
AU - Elders, Andrew
AU - Manoukian, Sarkis
AU - Agur, Wael
AU - Best, Catherine
AU - Breeman, Suzanne
AU - Dembinsky, Melanie
AU - Dwyer, Lucy
AU - Forrest, Mark
AU - Graham, Margaret
AU - Guerrero, Karen
AU - Hemming, Christine
AU - Khunda, Aethele
AU - Mason, Helen
AU - McClurg, Doreen
AU - Norrie, John
AU - Karachalia-Sandri, Anastasia
AU - Thakar, Ranee
AU - Bugge, Carol
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s).
PY - 2020/10/8
Y1 - 2020/10/8
N2 - Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (or prolapse) is a common condition in women where the pelvic organs (bladder, bowel or womb) descend into the vagina and cause distressing symptoms that adversely affect quality of life. Many women will use a vaginal pessary to treat their prolapse symptoms. Clinic-based care usually consists of having a pessary fitted in a primary or secondary care setting, and returning approximately every 6 months for healthcare professional review and pessary change. However, it is possible that women could remove, clean and re-insert their pessary themselves; this is called self-management. This trial aims to assess if self-management of a vaginal pessary is associated with better quality of life for women with prolapse when compared to clinic-based care. Methods: This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in at least 17 UK centres. The intervention group will receive pessary self-management teaching, a self-management information leaflet, a follow-up phone call and access to a local telephone number for clinical support. The control group will receive the clinic-based pessary care which is standard at their centre. Demographic and medical history data will be collected from both groups at baseline. The primary outcome is condition-specific quality of life at 18 months' post-randomisation. Several secondary outcomes will also be assessed using participant-completed questionnaires. Questionnaires will be administered at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months' post-randomisation. An economic evaluation will be carried out alongside the trial to evaluate cost-effectiveness. A process evaluation will run parallel to the trial, the protocol for which is reported in a companion paper. Discussion: The results of the trial will provide robust evidence of the effectiveness of pessary self-management compared to clinic-based care in terms of improving women's quality of life, and of its cost-effectiveness. Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN62510577. Registered on June 10, 2017.
AB - Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (or prolapse) is a common condition in women where the pelvic organs (bladder, bowel or womb) descend into the vagina and cause distressing symptoms that adversely affect quality of life. Many women will use a vaginal pessary to treat their prolapse symptoms. Clinic-based care usually consists of having a pessary fitted in a primary or secondary care setting, and returning approximately every 6 months for healthcare professional review and pessary change. However, it is possible that women could remove, clean and re-insert their pessary themselves; this is called self-management. This trial aims to assess if self-management of a vaginal pessary is associated with better quality of life for women with prolapse when compared to clinic-based care. Methods: This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in at least 17 UK centres. The intervention group will receive pessary self-management teaching, a self-management information leaflet, a follow-up phone call and access to a local telephone number for clinical support. The control group will receive the clinic-based pessary care which is standard at their centre. Demographic and medical history data will be collected from both groups at baseline. The primary outcome is condition-specific quality of life at 18 months' post-randomisation. Several secondary outcomes will also be assessed using participant-completed questionnaires. Questionnaires will be administered at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months' post-randomisation. An economic evaluation will be carried out alongside the trial to evaluate cost-effectiveness. A process evaluation will run parallel to the trial, the protocol for which is reported in a companion paper. Discussion: The results of the trial will provide robust evidence of the effectiveness of pessary self-management compared to clinic-based care in terms of improving women's quality of life, and of its cost-effectiveness. Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN62510577. Registered on June 10, 2017.
KW - Economic evaluation
KW - Pessary
KW - Prolapse
KW - Quality of life
KW - Randomised controlled trial (RCT)
KW - Self-management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092564638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13063-020-04738-9
DO - 10.1186/s13063-020-04738-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 33032644
AN - SCOPUS:85092564638
SN - 1745-6215
VL - 21
SP - 837
JO - Trials
JF - Trials
IS - 1
M1 - 837
ER -