TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical experience with perampanel
T2 - focus on psychiatric adverse effects.
AU - Coyle, H
AU - Clough, P
AU - Cooper, P
AU - Mohanraj, R
PY - 2014/10
Y1 - 2014/10
N2 - Perampanel (PER) is a novel antiepileptic drug that inhibits the AMPA class of glutamate receptors. It has been available in the UK since September 2012. We undertook a retrospective analysis of efficacy and tolerability of PER in 47 patients with drug-refractory epilepsy attending a regional epilepsy service in the UK.
Methods
Demographic and clinical data of patients with refractory epilepsy prescribed PER were collected by review of records. Efficacy, as measured by responder rates (> 50% reduction in seizure frequency), retention rates, and adverse effects, was analyzed.
Results
Of the 47 patients prescribed PER, 39 (87%) had focal epilepsy, four (9%) had idiopathic generalized epilepsy, 3 (6%) had symptomatic generalized epilepsy, and 1 had unclassified epilepsy. Patients were taking a median of 2 AEDs (range: 1–5) when starting on PER. The median dose of PER was 8 mg (range: 2–12 mg).
Thirteen (28%) patients were classed as responders, but no patients experienced sustained seizure freedom.
Twenty-one (45%) patients had withdrawn from PER during the study period, with 16 (76%) of them withdrawing due to intolerable adverse effects, 4 due to inadequate seizure control, and 1 due to the combination of both. The most frequent adverse effects requiring withdrawal from PER were behavioral reactions including suicidal ideation (n = 2), aggressive behavior (n = 2), and both (n = 1).
Conclusion
In our experience, PER had a retention rate of 55% and a responder rate of 28%. Psychiatric adverse effects, including suicidal ideation, were the most common reasons for withdrawal
AB - Perampanel (PER) is a novel antiepileptic drug that inhibits the AMPA class of glutamate receptors. It has been available in the UK since September 2012. We undertook a retrospective analysis of efficacy and tolerability of PER in 47 patients with drug-refractory epilepsy attending a regional epilepsy service in the UK.
Methods
Demographic and clinical data of patients with refractory epilepsy prescribed PER were collected by review of records. Efficacy, as measured by responder rates (> 50% reduction in seizure frequency), retention rates, and adverse effects, was analyzed.
Results
Of the 47 patients prescribed PER, 39 (87%) had focal epilepsy, four (9%) had idiopathic generalized epilepsy, 3 (6%) had symptomatic generalized epilepsy, and 1 had unclassified epilepsy. Patients were taking a median of 2 AEDs (range: 1–5) when starting on PER. The median dose of PER was 8 mg (range: 2–12 mg).
Thirteen (28%) patients were classed as responders, but no patients experienced sustained seizure freedom.
Twenty-one (45%) patients had withdrawn from PER during the study period, with 16 (76%) of them withdrawing due to intolerable adverse effects, 4 due to inadequate seizure control, and 1 due to the combination of both. The most frequent adverse effects requiring withdrawal from PER were behavioral reactions including suicidal ideation (n = 2), aggressive behavior (n = 2), and both (n = 1).
Conclusion
In our experience, PER had a retention rate of 55% and a responder rate of 28%. Psychiatric adverse effects, including suicidal ideation, were the most common reasons for withdrawal
KW - Perampanel
KW - Suicidality
KW - Epilepsy
UR - http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/25461214
U2 - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.072
DO - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.072
M3 - Article
C2 - 25461214
SN - 1525-5069
VL - 41
SP - 193
EP - 196
JO - Epilepsy & Behavior
JF - Epilepsy & Behavior
ER -