Abstract
Background
The current study investigated how ideas and models from the ‘New Genetics’ and associated fields of developmental neuroscience and behavioural phenotypes are perceived by clinical psychologists working with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). As well as examining the take-up and influence of such ideas, it also examines barriers, both personal and institutional, to the widespread adoption of such concepts and research findings in services for people with IDD.
Methods
A Q-methodology study was undertaken with 31 qualified and 16 trainee clinical psychologists in the North West of England using a specifically developed 81-item Q set.
Results
Three factors were identified and labelled Integration of social and medical models, Social model of disability is more helpful and Genetic advances in conflict with recognising the value of people with IDD.
Conclusion
There was a lack of consensus in clinical psychologists working with people with IDD, with amount and type of professional experience affecting the factor loadings, which may need to be considered in developing clinical applications of genetic IDD research.
The current study investigated how ideas and models from the ‘New Genetics’ and associated fields of developmental neuroscience and behavioural phenotypes are perceived by clinical psychologists working with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). As well as examining the take-up and influence of such ideas, it also examines barriers, both personal and institutional, to the widespread adoption of such concepts and research findings in services for people with IDD.
Methods
A Q-methodology study was undertaken with 31 qualified and 16 trainee clinical psychologists in the North West of England using a specifically developed 81-item Q set.
Results
Three factors were identified and labelled Integration of social and medical models, Social model of disability is more helpful and Genetic advances in conflict with recognising the value of people with IDD.
Conclusion
There was a lack of consensus in clinical psychologists working with people with IDD, with amount and type of professional experience affecting the factor loadings, which may need to be considered in developing clinical applications of genetic IDD research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Intellectual Disability Research |
Early online date | 29 Feb 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical psychologists' attitudes towards the biology and "new genetics" of intellectual and developmental disabilities: a pilot study using Q-methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Student theses
-
Use of Q-methodology to identify clinical psychologists' attitudes towards genetic research affecting people with intellectual and developmental disabilities
Vahey, C. (Author), Hare, D. (Supervisor), 31 Dec 2013Student thesis: Doctor of Clinical Psychology
File