@article{03300a9b811544d6b16fffae577be01b,
title = "Clusters and economic development outcomes: An analysis of the link between clustering and industry growth",
abstract = "Much of the existing empirical research on industry clusters focuses on the detection of clusters for economic development purposes. There are comparatively few studies that relate identified clusters to business and industry growth or that trace changes in designated clusters over time. This article seeks to better understand the link between industry clustering and regional economic outcomes. In a comprehensive study sponsored by the Appalachian Regional Commission and released in 2002, the authors identified technology-based clusters within and on the border of the Appalachian region. The Appalachian technology clusters constituted subregional concentrations of related industrial, research and development, and university-based strengths as of the middle to late 1990s. In this article, the authors investigate how the industries in the identified clusters fared over the subsequent several years in terms of employment and new business formation. They find evidence that clustering is associated with new business formation for selected technology industries but not with employment growth. {\textcopyright} 2008 SAGE Publications.",
keywords = "Appalachia, Entrepreneurship, Industry cluster, Regional growth",
author = "Edward Feser and Henry Renski and Harvey Goldstein",
note = "Cited By (since 1996): 10 Export Date: 12 January 2012 Source: Scopus Language of Original Document: English Correspondence Address: Feser, E.; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States References: Acs, Z.J., Armington, C., Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities (2004) Regional Studies, 38 (9), pp. 911-927; Armington, C., Acs, Z., The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation (2002) Regional Studies, 36 (1), pp. 33-45; Buenstorf, G., Klepper, S., (2005) Heritage and Agglomeration: The Akron Tire Cluster Revisited (Papers on Economics and Evolution, 2005-08), , Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group; Caves, R.E., Porter, M.E., From entry barriers to mobility barriers (1977) Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, pp. 241-261; Dumais, G., Ellison, G., Glaeser, E.L., Geographic concentration as a dynamic process (2002) Review of Economics and Statistics, 84 (2), pp. 193-204; Feser, E., Goldstein, H., Renski, H., Renault, C., (2002) Regional Technology Assets and Opportunities: The Geographic Clustering of High-tech Industry, Science and Innovation in Appalachia, , Washington, DC: Appalachian Regional Commission; Feser, E., Koo, J., (2000) High-tech Clusters in North Carolina, , Raleigh: North Carolina Board of Science and Technology; Feser, E.J., Sweeney, S.H., A test for the coincident economic and spatial clustering of business enterprises (2000) Journal of Geographical Systems, 2, pp. 349-373; Figueiredo, O., Guimar{\~a}es, P., Woodward, D., Home-field advantage: Location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs (2002) Journal of Urban Economics, 52, pp. 341-361; Gabe, T.M., Kraybill, D.S., The effect of state economic development incentives on employment growth of establishments (2002) Journal of Regional Science, 42, pp. 703-730; Getis, A., Interaction modeling using second-order analysis (1984) Environment and Planning A 16, pp. 173-183; Guimar{\~a}es, P., Figueiredo, O., Woodward, D., A tractable approach to the firm location decision problem (2003) Review of Economics and Statistics, 85 (1), pp. 201-204; Harrison, B., (1994) Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility, , New York: Basic Books; Heckman, J.J., Sample selection bias as a specification error (1979) Econometrica, 47, pp. 161-196; Isserman, A., Westervelt, J., 1.5 million missing numbers: Overcoming employment suppression in County Business Patterns data (2006) International Regional Science Review, 29, pp. 311-339; Meester, W., (2004) Locational Preferences of Entrepreneurs: Stated Preference in the Netherlands and Germany, , Heidelberg and New York: Physica; (1995) Research-doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change, , National Research Council Washington, DC: Author, National Academy of Sciences; Ord, J.K., Getis, A., Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and an application (1995) Geographical Analysis, 27 (4), pp. 286-306; Porter, M.E., Clusters and the new economics of competition (1998) Harvard Business Review, pp. 77-90. , (November/December); Porter, M.E., The economic performance of regions (2003) Regional Studies, 37 (6-7), pp. 549-578; Rosenthal, S.S., Strange, W.C., Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration (2003) Review of Economics and Statistics, 85 (2), pp. 377-393; Sweeney, S.H., Feser, E.J., Plant size and clustering of manufacturing activity (1998) Geographical Analysis, 30 (1), pp. 45-64; (2000) United States Patent Grants By State, County, and Metropolitan Area (utility Patents 1990-1999), , U. S. Patent & Trademark Office. Washington, DC: Author, Office for Patent and Trademark Information",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1177/0891242408325419",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "324--344",
journal = "Economic Development Quarterly",
issn = "0891-2424",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",
}