Cohort differences in the levels and trajectories of frailty among older people in England

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background The level of frailty in the older populationacross age cohorts and how this changes is a factor in determining future care costs and may also influence the extent of socioeconomic and gender inequalities in frailty. Methods We model cohort-specic trajectories in frailtyamong the community dwelling population older than 50 years, using 5 waves (2002–2010) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. We stratify our analysis by wealth and gender and use a frailty index, based on accumulation of deficits Results For males and females between the ages of 50 and 70 in 2002, frailty trajectories for adjacent age cohorts converge. However, levels of frailty are higher in recent compared with earlier cohorts at the older ages(for cohorts aged over 70 in 2002). These cohort differences are largest in the poorest wealth group, while for the most affluent, frailty trajectories overlap across all adjacent cohorts suggesting no change across cohorts. Conclusions A key driver of the cohort differences in frailty that we observe is likely to be increased survival of frail individuals. Importantly, this paper illustrates that the social conditions experienced across the wealth distribution impacts on the rate of deficit accumulation in older populations. Our results on trajectories of frailty between 2002 and 2010 are pessimistic and, in the context of rising life expectancies, suggest that poorer older people in particular spend additional years of lifein a frail state
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)316-321
JournalJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health
Volume69
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2015

Keywords

  • ageing
  • inequality
  • longitudinal study
  • cohort study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cohort differences in the levels and trajectories of frailty among older people in England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this