Collective Management of Music Copyright in China: Insights for the Regulation of the Monopolistic and Monopsonistic Power of the Music Copyright Society of China from a Comparative Legal Approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper discusses the regulations which limit the monopolistic and monopsonistic power of the Music Copyright Society of China (MCSC) in the context of the broader legal framework for the collective management of music copyright in China. The paper identifies "inadequate regulation" as a major cause of the misuse of such market power by the MCSC. Using a comparative approach, the paper analyses the regulatory regime that addresses the abuse of the market power of the American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers (ASCAP) and Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) , the two oldest performing rights organisations (PROs) in the United States. Drawing lessons from the United States experience, this paper challenges the notion that establishing more musical collective management organisations (CMOs) in China would decrease the monopolistic and/or monopsonistic power of the MCSC. While the Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law cannot be applied to regulate the market power of the MCSC, this paper advocates for improving the current Regulations on Copyright Collective Administration (RCCA) as an alternative option for preventing the misuse of power by the MCSC.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-51
Number of pages29
JournalReview of the Economic Research on Copyright Issues
Volume17
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collective Management of Music Copyright in China: Insights for the Regulation of the Monopolistic and Monopsonistic Power of the Music Copyright Society of China from a Comparative Legal Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this