Combining quantitative and qualitative research to engage stakeholders in developing quality indicators in general practice.

David Jeacocke, Richard Heller, Justine Smith, Danielle Anthony, Jenny Stewart Williams, Anni Dugdale

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In 2000, the Newcastle Institute of Public Health (NIPH) undertook a project that aimed to review, identify and where necessary, develop a range of indicators of quality service provision in general practice. We describe the way in which quantitative and qualitative research methods (including a Delphi style survey) were combined to investigate consensus amongst stakeholders in defining quality indicators. Over 500 general practice stakeholders were consulted. They included general practitioners (GPs) and their representative groups, academics, policy makers, and consumers. Several important lessons were learnt from the process, including the importance of involving a broad representative group of stakeholders, informing workshop participants in advance, providing adequate response times for the Delphi surveys and using videoconferencing technologies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)12-18
    Number of pages6
    JournalAustralian Health Review
    Volume25
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Keywords

    • Aged
    • Attitude of Health Personnel
    • Australia
    • Consensus
    • Consensus Development Conferences
    • Consumer Participation
    • Delphi Technique
    • Evaluation Studies
    • Family Practice
    • Focus Groups
    • Human
    • Investments
    • methods
    • Pilot Projects
    • Public Health
    • Public Health Administration
    • Qualitative Research
    • Quality Indicators,Health Care
    • Research
    • Review Literature
    • standards
    • Support,Non-U.S.Gov't
    • Time

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Combining quantitative and qualitative research to engage stakeholders in developing quality indicators in general practice.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this