Commentary: Bringing together lived experience, clinical and research expertise – a commentary on the May 2022 debate (should CAMH professionals be diagnosing personality disorder in adolescence?)

Samantha Hartley; Charley Baker; Michael  Birtwhistle; Jennifer L  Burgess; Eleanor  Chatburn; Laurence  Cobbaert; Maddie  Howley; Charlotte Huggett; Charlie  MacKenzie-Nash; Alice Newton; Sarah Parry; Jee  Smith; Christopher D. J. Taylor; Peter James Taylor; Robyn  Timoclea

doi:10.1111/camh.12586

Commentary: Bringing together lived experience, clinical and research expertise – a commentary on the May 2022 debate (should CAMH professionals be diagnosing personality disorder in adolescence?)

Samantha Hartley, Charley Baker, Michael Birtwhistle, Jennifer L Burgess, Eleanor Chatburn, Laurence Cobbaert, Maddie Howley, Charlotte Huggett, Charlie MacKenzie-Nash, Alice Newton, Sarah Parry, Jee Smith, Christopher D. J. Taylor, Peter James Taylor, Robyn Timoclea

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: There is a wealth of evidence to suggest that the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD, or similar Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, EUPD) construct is harmful. We provide a commentary on the ideas expressed in the May Debate issue, highlighting both concerns and alternatives.
Method: We bring together lived experience, clinical, and research expertise. This commentary was written collaboratively drawing on all these sources of evidence.
Results: We outline evidence that the BPD construct is invalid, harmful, not necessary for effective treatment and a potential block to the development and evaluation of alternatives.
Conclusions: We ask readers to consider these concerns, perspectives, and ideas.

Original language	English
Journal	Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Early online date	22 Jul 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12586
Publication status	Published - 16 Aug 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1111/camh.12586Licence: CC BY

Child Adoles Ment Health - 2022 - Hartley - Commentary Bringing together lived experience clinical and research expertiseFinal published version, 153 KB

Embargoed Document

Should child and adolescent mental health professionals be diagnosing personality disorder in adolescence
Accepted author manuscript, 40.6 KB
Embargo ends: 1/01/32

Cite this

Hartley, S., Baker, C., Birtwhistle, M., Burgess, J. L., Chatburn, E., Cobbaert, L., Howley, M., Huggett, C., MacKenzie-Nash, C., Newton, A., Parry, S., Smith, J., Taylor, C. D. J., Taylor, P. J., & Timoclea, R. (2022). Commentary: Bringing together lived experience, clinical and research expertise – a commentary on the May 2022 debate (should CAMH professionals be diagnosing personality disorder in adolescence?). Child and Adolescent Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12586

@article{50f78e5671cc4e38a30d353f26666dd2,

title = "Commentary: Bringing together lived experience, clinical and research expertise – a commentary on the May 2022 debate (should CAMH professionals be diagnosing personality disorder in adolescence?)",

abstract = "Background: There is a wealth of evidence to suggest that the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD, or similar Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, EUPD) construct is harmful. We provide a commentary on the ideas expressed in the May Debate issue, highlighting both concerns and alternatives. Method: We bring together lived experience, clinical, and research expertise. This commentary was written collaboratively drawing on all these sources of evidence. Results: We outline evidence that the BPD construct is invalid, harmful, not necessary for effective treatment and a potential block to the development and evaluation of alternatives. Conclusions: We ask readers to consider these concerns, perspectives, and ideas.",

author = "Samantha Hartley and Charley Baker and Michael Birtwhistle and Burgess, {Jennifer L} and Eleanor Chatburn and Laurence Cobbaert and Maddie Howley and Charlotte Huggett and Charlie MacKenzie-Nash and Alice Newton and Sarah Parry and Jee Smith and Taylor, {Christopher D. J.} and Taylor, {Peter James} and Robyn Timoclea",

year = "2022",

month = aug,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1111/camh.12586",

language = "English",

journal = "Child and Adolescent Mental Health",

issn = "1475-357X",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd",

}

Hartley, S, Baker, C, Birtwhistle, M, Burgess, JL, Chatburn, E, Cobbaert, L, Howley, M, Huggett, C, MacKenzie-Nash, C, Newton, A, Parry, S, Smith, J, Taylor, CDJ , Taylor, PJ & Timoclea, R 2022, 'Commentary: Bringing together lived experience, clinical and research expertise – a commentary on the May 2022 debate (should CAMH professionals be diagnosing personality disorder in adolescence?)', Child and Adolescent Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12586

Commentary: Bringing together lived experience, clinical and research expertise – a commentary on the May 2022 debate (should CAMH professionals be diagnosing personality disorder in adolescence?). / Hartley, Samantha; Baker, Charley; Birtwhistle, Michael et al.

In: Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 16.08.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary: Bringing together lived experience, clinical and research expertise – a commentary on the May 2022 debate (should CAMH professionals be diagnosing personality disorder in adolescence?)

AU - Hartley, Samantha

AU - Baker, Charley

AU - Birtwhistle, Michael

AU - Burgess, Jennifer L

AU - Chatburn, Eleanor

AU - Cobbaert, Laurence

AU - Howley, Maddie

AU - Huggett, Charlotte

AU - MacKenzie-Nash, Charlie

AU - Newton, Alice

AU - Parry, Sarah

AU - Smith, Jee

AU - Taylor, Christopher D. J.

AU - Taylor, Peter James

AU - Timoclea, Robyn

PY - 2022/8/16

Y1 - 2022/8/16

N2 - Background: There is a wealth of evidence to suggest that the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD, or similar Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, EUPD) construct is harmful. We provide a commentary on the ideas expressed in the May Debate issue, highlighting both concerns and alternatives. Method: We bring together lived experience, clinical, and research expertise. This commentary was written collaboratively drawing on all these sources of evidence. Results: We outline evidence that the BPD construct is invalid, harmful, not necessary for effective treatment and a potential block to the development and evaluation of alternatives. Conclusions: We ask readers to consider these concerns, perspectives, and ideas.

AB - Background: There is a wealth of evidence to suggest that the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD, or similar Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, EUPD) construct is harmful. We provide a commentary on the ideas expressed in the May Debate issue, highlighting both concerns and alternatives. Method: We bring together lived experience, clinical, and research expertise. This commentary was written collaboratively drawing on all these sources of evidence. Results: We outline evidence that the BPD construct is invalid, harmful, not necessary for effective treatment and a potential block to the development and evaluation of alternatives. Conclusions: We ask readers to consider these concerns, perspectives, and ideas.

U2 - 10.1111/camh.12586

DO - 10.1111/camh.12586

M3 - Article

JO - Child and Adolescent Mental Health

JF - Child and Adolescent Mental Health

SN - 1475-357X

ER -

Commentary: Bringing together lived experience, clinical and research expertise – a commentary on the May 2022 debate (should CAMH professionals be diagnosing personality disorder in adolescence?)

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Embargoed Document

Fingerprint

Cite this