Comparative efficacy, speed, and adverse effects of three PTSD treatments: Exposure therapy, EMDR, and relaxation training

Steven Taylor, Dana S. Thordarson, Ingrid C. Fedoroff, Louise Maxfield, Karina Lovell, John Ogrodniczuk

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The authors examined the efficacy, speed, and incidence of symptom worsening for 3 treatments of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): prolonged exposure, relaxation training, or eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR; N = 60). Treatments did not differ in attrition, in the incidence of symptom worsening, or in their effects on numbing and hyperarousal symptoms. Compared with EMDR and relaxation training, exposure therapy (a) produced significantly larger reductions in avoidance and reexperiencing symptoms, (b) tended to be faster at reducing avoidance, and (c) tended to yield a greater proportion of participants who no longer met criteria for PTSD after treatment. EMDR and relaxation did not differ from one another in speed or efficacy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)330-338
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
    Volume71
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2003

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative efficacy, speed, and adverse effects of three PTSD treatments: Exposure therapy, EMDR, and relaxation training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this