TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative treatment costs of risk-stratified therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in India
AU - Mungle, Tushar
AU - Das, Nandana
AU - Pal, Saikat
AU - Gogoi, Manash Pratim
AU - Das, Parag
AU - Ghara, Niharendu
AU - Ghosh, Debjani
AU - Arora, Ramandeep Singh
AU - Bhakta, Nickhill
AU - Saha, Vaskar
AU - Krishnan, Shekhar
N1 - © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - BACKGROUND: To evaluate the treatment cost and cost effectiveness of a risk-stratified therapy to treat pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in India.METHODS: The cost of total treatment duration was calculated for a retrospective cohort of ALL children treated at a tertiary care facility. Children were risk stratified into standard (SR), intermediate (IR) and high (HR) for B-cell precursor ALL, and T-ALL. Cost of therapy was obtained from the hospital electronic billing systems and details of outpatient (OP) and inpatient (IP) from electronic medical records. Cost effectiveness was calculated in disability-adjusted life years.RESULTS: One hundred and forty five patients, SR (50), IR (36), HR (39), and T-ALL (20) were analyzed. Median cost of the entire treatment for SR, IR, HR, and T-ALL was found to be $3900, $5500, $7400, and $8700, respectively, with chemotherapy contributing to 25%-35% of total cost. Out-patient costs were significantly lower for SR (p < 0.0001). OP costs were higher than in-patient costs for SR and IR, while in-patient costs were higher in T-ALL. Costs for non-therapy admissions were significantly higher in HR and T-ALL (p < 0.0001), representing over 50% of costs of in-patient therapy. HR and T-ALL also had longer durations of non-therapy admissions. Based on WHO-CHOICE guidelines, the risk-stratified approach was very cost effective for all categories of patients.CONCLUSIONS: Risk-stratified approach to treat childhood ALL is very cost-effective for all categories in our setting. The cost for SR and IR patients is significantly reduced through decreased IP admissions for both, chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy reasons.
AB - BACKGROUND: To evaluate the treatment cost and cost effectiveness of a risk-stratified therapy to treat pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in India.METHODS: The cost of total treatment duration was calculated for a retrospective cohort of ALL children treated at a tertiary care facility. Children were risk stratified into standard (SR), intermediate (IR) and high (HR) for B-cell precursor ALL, and T-ALL. Cost of therapy was obtained from the hospital electronic billing systems and details of outpatient (OP) and inpatient (IP) from electronic medical records. Cost effectiveness was calculated in disability-adjusted life years.RESULTS: One hundred and forty five patients, SR (50), IR (36), HR (39), and T-ALL (20) were analyzed. Median cost of the entire treatment for SR, IR, HR, and T-ALL was found to be $3900, $5500, $7400, and $8700, respectively, with chemotherapy contributing to 25%-35% of total cost. Out-patient costs were significantly lower for SR (p < 0.0001). OP costs were higher than in-patient costs for SR and IR, while in-patient costs were higher in T-ALL. Costs for non-therapy admissions were significantly higher in HR and T-ALL (p < 0.0001), representing over 50% of costs of in-patient therapy. HR and T-ALL also had longer durations of non-therapy admissions. Based on WHO-CHOICE guidelines, the risk-stratified approach was very cost effective for all categories of patients.CONCLUSIONS: Risk-stratified approach to treat childhood ALL is very cost-effective for all categories in our setting. The cost for SR and IR patients is significantly reduced through decreased IP admissions for both, chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy reasons.
KW - Child
KW - Humans
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy
KW - Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy
KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
KW - Health Care Costs
U2 - 10.1002/cam4.5140
DO - 10.1002/cam4.5140
M3 - Article
C2 - 36812120
SN - 2045-7634
VL - 12
SP - 3499
EP - 3508
JO - Cancer Medicine
JF - Cancer Medicine
IS - 3
ER -