Comparing Clinical Outcomes for Radium-223: Do Older Patients Do Worse?

Yee Pei Song, Tracey Ellis, Richard Walshaw, Peter Mbanu, Omi Parikh, John Logue, Ananya Choudhury*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the clinical benefits and toxicities of 223Ra in 2 different age groups of patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: This was a retrospective study of patients treated with 223Ra in 2 tertiary centers. Patients were divided into 2 different groups based on their age (≥72 years old and <72 years old). Treatment toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Comparison of characteristics and outcome was carried out with the Mann-Whitney test and analysis of overall survival with the log-rank test. Results: In all, 129 patients were treated during the study period. Clinical benefit was similar in both groups. However, a statistically significant higher proportion of patients in the younger group had previously been treated with docetaxel. There was a higher rate of grade 3 anemia in younger patients. Conclusions: In line with other studies, 223Ra was well tolerated with minimum toxicities. The significantly higher rate of grade 3 anemia in younger patients may be due to more cautious patient selection in the elderly population.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Early online date29 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Cancer Research Centre

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Clinical Outcomes for Radium-223: Do Older Patients Do Worse?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this