Comparing the performance of market-based and accounting-based bankruptcy prediction models

Vineet Agarwal, Richard Taffler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recently developed corporate bankruptcy prediction models adopt a contingent claims valuation approach. However, despite their theoretical appeal, tests of their performance compared with traditional simple accounting-ratio-based approaches are limited in the literature. We find the two approaches capture different aspects of bankruptcy risk, and while there is little difference in their predictive ability in the UK, the z-score approach leads to significantly greater bank profitability in conditions of differential decision error costs and competitive pricing regime. © 2007.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1541-1551
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Banking and Finance
Volume32
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2008

Keywords

  • Bank profitability
  • Credit risk
  • Failure prediction
  • Option-pricing models
  • Z-score

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing the performance of market-based and accounting-based bankruptcy prediction models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this